On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 13:32 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 13:03, Jakub Moc wrote: > > And RESTRICT=sandbox is still completely unneeded, > > commercial packages or not... We don't need to introduce a special > > RESTRICT because of two borked packages in the tree and we should not > > introduce any more packages borked in a similar way into the tree. > > for future reference, keep your replies on topic and stupid rants out > > this is what you should have said in the first place > > we need a real solution for emacs/gcl ... exporting SANDBOX_ON=0 is not the > answer > -mike
Here's a real solution for gcl: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161041#c7 Y'know, if even a tenth of the energy that went into this flame war had gone into solving the emacs sandbox breakage, I'm pretty sure that would have been fixed by now as well. Funny, that. Ed -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
