On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:04:21 +0100 Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:55:44AM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:41:27 +0100 Harald van Dijk | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | I don't think anyone was planning on encouraging people to mess | > | with ACCEPT_RESTRICT if it gets implemented. | > | > Implementing it *is* encouraging people to mess with it. | | Just like people are encouraged to use FEATURES="noauto noclean"? | Implementing it is not encouraging people to mess with it.
FEATURES has legitimate values. The feature as a whole is useful, even if some of the options have very restricted target audiences. | As for the legitimate use, I won't try to convince you that there are | legitimate uses, but rather, even if it is silly, what does it matter | to you? It matters in that there's even more time being spent going off on completely the wrong track that would be of more use elsewhere. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
