On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 14:46 +0000, Roy Marples wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:39:05 +0100 > "Rob C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For what its worth, I think option #2 is the best. > > > > I think option #1 is out of the question and I think that #3 is flawed > > because the 8th spot developer's situation or commitment to the > > project may have changed since the last vote and in any case that > > developer would be free to partake in the running vote with #2. > > > > Cheers > > -Rob > > Then it should be offered to the 8th person, at which point either > he/she will then refuse the nomination and it's offered to the 9th. > Rinse and repeat. > If we run out of nominees then we'll need another election. >
Agreed. #3 >From my POV having a new election potentially over and over is a waste of time and resources. -- Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
