On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:20:37 +0100 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:22:55 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I cannot agree on the Genstef-thingy, nor can I proof you wrong, > >> but I'd be please if in general such things could be done > >> anonymous as it is in some way FUD and might fuel flames...userrel > >> and userreps are there to be talked to about such things. > > > > Well that's my point. Userrel and userreps have nothing to do with > > such things. And although QA and devrel can, in theory, take > > action, it isn't happening. > > saw in the full context looks a bit different than what I was > expecting, a 2byte change that is more or less a syntax nuance could > be as quickly addressed by the reporter than the developer.
QA is supposed to avoid fixing other people's code where things are actively maintained. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
