On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:46 +0000, Stephen Bennett wrote: > On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:11:43 +0100 > Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There's absolutely no reason to absorb every single version naming > > scheme on earth. Gentoo's does work nicely and more than we have > > would only be irritating to the user. Simply use _pre<datecode> or > > whatever fits, but extending our naming scheme is unneeded and > > pointless. > > And of course there is the issue of how older Portage releases will > react to ebuild names that they don't understand.
Understandable for sure. Thus not really putting any sort of time frame on implementation. Maybe EAPI=1 or beyond. Up to others that would implement it. Just was tossing it out there, providing some feedback. -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
