On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:58:52 +0100 Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> PMS: > >> - should be up and running on Gentoo infra by next meeting > > > > What is the justification for making this change? It's already > > inconvenient enough having to have someone else make bugzilla > > changes for me on PMS bugs that I didn't submit; what reason is > > there for extending this annoyance to the source too? > > > [16:47] <Kugelfang> vapier: it is already a QA subproject > > It's not such a big deal in practise is it?
Yes, it is. It's a change in workflow, and it at least doubles the amount of work for each commit. > Unless you're saying you can't use git? Which would be decidedly > strange for a kernel contributor.. I'm saying I don't see any point in it when svn is doing the job just fine now. If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's more work, I'll change. If there isn't a good reason, I won't. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
