On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 07:21:02PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 6 May 2007 14:17:29 -0400 > Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > which elog could easily be extended to do. > > > > > > But which elog does not do by default, and for good reason. > > > > and what good reason would that be? > > That elog is designed for post-install messages that aren't necessarily > relevant to many users.
Elog is a general mechanism; einfo/ewarn/enotice (etc) are designed to seperate what's "relevant to users"- so you'll need a better reason :) ~harring
pgp8vRcTSlE9n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
