>>>>> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: >> I could not find any official guidelines for keywording of virtual >> packages.
> They are keyworded as any other packages. You can't make them stable > if they have ~arch only dependencies. When one provider is stable, > they are fine to go stable. Yes, I think this part is clear. The point of my question was more if the usual rules apply, i.e.: keywording and stabilising only by arch teams; wait one month before the package can go stable. Which seems not to be current practice for virtual packages. (And makes no sense anyway, IMHO.) Ulrich -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
