Doug Goldstein wrote: > Howdy all, > > I just bumped into something I feel is a Portage and PMS bug. Since I > believe in concrete use cases, I'll just go with that. > > Currently in the tree we have sys-fs/ntfs3g. However the proper upstream > name and name referenced in every single doc in the world is "ntfs-3g". > I tried to rename the package however, Portage does not let me since it > is invalid naming. marienz and genone informed me it's invalid with PMS > as well. > > The version I was trying to add is ntfs-3g-1.516. Logically Portage and > PMS should only consider any data after the LAST - as the version > information. Now in the cpv scheme of things, it's not undeterministic > because the following two entries would be the only valid entries: > > sys-fs/ntfs-3g > =sys-fs/ntfs-3g-1.516 > > Either way, that's my beef. > It seems my issue has been brought up in bug #174536 [1]. Sorry for the noise.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174536 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
