On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:32:40 -0400 Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote: > > Currently in the tree we have sys-fs/ntfs3g. However the proper > > upstream name and name referenced in every single doc in the world > > is "ntfs-3g". I tried to rename the package however, Portage does > > not let me since it is invalid naming. marienz and genone informed > > me it's invalid with PMS as well. > > > > The version I was trying to add is ntfs-3g-1.516. Logically Portage > > and PMS should only consider any data after the LAST - as the > > version information. > > Would this cause problems anywhere if we had the following? > > sys-fs/ntfs/ntfs-3g.ebuild > and > sys-fs/ntfs-3g/ntfs-3g-1.516.ebuild Thing is: if you see sys-fs/ntfs-3g, is that an atom or a CPV? You don't know unless you actually check the tree. Marius -- Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
