_JusSx_ wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
>> A little background info: Right now there are three versions of
>> net-im/skype in the tree:
>>
>> 1 - the 1.2 series (with a stable version)
>> 2- the 1.3 series also with a stable version
>> 3- the 1.4 series with a ~/hardmask version
>>
>> Also the skype license states that we cannot mirror it's files (this
>> will be need later)
>>
>> The 1.4 series will have a version released soon that skype wants to
>> become the standard stable version, it has many new features and bette=
r
>> audio quality.
>>
>> I as Gentoo Dev and Skype Betatester was informed that starting on Jun=
e
>> 19th Skype will no longer provide downloads for the 1.2 and 1.3 versio=
n,
>> and that means that 1.4 will be released some time before. For Gentoo
>> that means that starting from the 19th users on the stable profile wil=
l
>> not be able to install skype as no files will be available from upstre=
am.
>>
>> So the thing is, as soon as Skype releases the 1.4 stable version I'm
>> going to have it in tree and we need to have it tested ASAP on the
>> stable profile. My thing is with the time between, we will have 5 days=

>> tops or users will not be able to install.
>>
>> Suggestions:
>> 1- in the 19th remove skype < 1.4 from the tree
>> 2- Make < 1.4 ebuilds "empty" and leave them on the tree and ewarn the=

>> users to use the unstable skype
>>
>>
>> The first option will trigger portage errors and prompt users to open
>> bugs until we have a stable 1.4, the second gives us a chance to expla=
in
>> the issue.
>>
>> Any alternatives?
>>
>> --=20
>> Gustavo Felisberto
>> (HumpBack)
>> Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~humpback
>> Blog: http://blog.felisberto.net/
>> ------------
>> It's most certainly GNU/Linux, not Linux. Read more at
>> http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html .
>> -------------
>>
>>
> Let's remove it from portage. why should we use it? I run it for a bit =
I
> can say it's awful... it is closed-source, is not it? so I think it's
> better not to install it...

As we've established earlier, being closed-source is not sufficient
reason for removing any program from Portage; you should have read the
rest of the thread.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to