On 12:40 Fri 10 Aug , Duncan wrote:
> Agreed. Within the limited scope of dodoc, under what legitimate
> circumstances might a file /not/ be there to "dodoc" for a user, when
> it's there for a maintainer? (OTOH, now that portage is recompressing
> all such files based on the PORTAGE_COMPRESS setting, I suppose it's
> possible the user screwed up their PORTAGE_COMPRESS setting. Still, if
> they screw up portage variables they should /expect/ it to have problems.)
if use uncommon_use_flag && ! use another_uncommon_flag; then
dodoc foo
fi
Thanks,
Donnie
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
