Petteri Räty wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti:
>> Unportable to filesystems that don't support extended attributes isn't 
>> very interesting to me, unless they're common. Out of curiosity, do you 
>> know which ones that would be? Looking at my kernel config, ext3 and 
>> reiser explicitly support xattrs, and I see jfs and xfs have acls and 
>> security labels, which might be usable. Unsyncable would be a problem, 
>> so it's a good thing rsync has USE=xattr -- do the difficulties come in 
>> on the CVS side? Why do you say unmaintainable?
>>
> 
> Many users might have extended attributes support turned off in the kernel.

/me raises hand. yup. don't use 'em. waste of kernel space.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to