Programming Languages and (sub) Ada Monday, 7. January 2008, Luca Barbato Ви написали: > Are we fine? PL: Ok as it is but could be better. It was concieved, among other things, to consolidate resources and, possibly, do discussions of common things for some of the languages we have support for (one even almost happend in bug #151343), however right now it pretty much only serves as a placeholder for specific resources and docs for some of them. Even there there are only Ada and Haskell, while we have many more..
Ada: Quite good actually. I completed all the outstanding parts of the transition to multiple compilers. We already have one Ada-2005 compiler in the tree. Another one, - gnat-gcc-4.3 will be coming when gcc-4.3 is finally released. > What are we going to do: PL: not much at present - it is there as it is, however if there is interest we could expand it, or at least get a bit more organization in now separate but seemengly related packages. Ada: Complete transition, update libs, regular maintenance, new packages - pretty much regular stuff.. George -- [email protected] mailing list
