On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Markus Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 > 21:38:36 +0100: > > > djvu: Enable support for DjVu (a digital document format with advanced > > compression technology and high performance value) > > I'm not complaining if this is deemed acceptable, but I thought the idea > was to keep it to 80 chars, if possible. If that's the case, perhaps > leaving it at (a digital document format) might be preferable. That > still says at least what it is, so is workable IMO, even if the longer > description is certainly nicer if the 80 char limit no longer applies. >
What about: djvu: support DjVu, a PDF-like document format esp. suited for scanned documents -- Paul de Vrieze Researcher Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
