Christoph Mende wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
"William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unless the work to do that is greater than the value of the change.
It most likely is. And beside of that: amd64 is the technically correct
term. :p
*sigh* I know I'm going to regret going down this road, but, "lies!". ;)
AMD implemented x86-64, and marketed it as "AMD64". Intel cloned it as "EM64T",
later renamed "Intel 64". GCC compiles for x86-64 which is the subset of the two.
But I agree, rekeywording amd64 to x86_64 would probably be more work than it's
worth.
--
fonts, by design, by neglect
gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect
wxwindows @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
