-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jeroen Roovers wrote: | Hi developers and other users, | | | since jakub[1] went completely missing a few weeks ago a few others and | I have been wrangling the bugs. I've heard rumours that this isn't | working smoothly yet. Of course most of that can be fully blamed on | bugzilla itself, but there are some things that need to be pointed out | or discussed. | | One thing I'd like to point out is that if you don't agree with a | specific mangle, just CC whoever did it on the bug and explain. | If you don't give me the feedback, I can never know how you would | rather have wanted to get bugs delivered. | | One other thing is that it is sometimes difficult to figure out to | whom a bug should be assigned, because metadata.xml for many packages | simply isn't clear. If you list a few developers as well as a herd, | does that mean you want bugs assigned to the herd or to a single | developer who happens to be in that list? Some packages list several | herds in metadata.xml. Bugs can be assigned to just one address | (or you get "Assignee: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] did not | match anything"). |
I'd say that in the case of a herd listed , the bug should be sent there. If it doesn't specify a herd but several developers, sending the bug to any or all of them should be the rule. | All in all I guess we need to make the rules up as we go and decide | policy later. I suggest the first herd/address in the list should be | the primary contact. If you don't agree with that, please consult I agree. - -- Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org" Gentoo Linux -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgRBIoACgkQNir3WYj9aLp8UwCfeiHyHDQCDXd1nw0/oauctVVc UWkAn0Y4b1Be65A0ThXqDQIbTXRGbKSv =YVb7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
