Jeroen Roovers wrote: > All in all I guess we need to make the rules up as we go and decide > policy later. I suggest the first herd/address in the list should be > the primary contact. If you don't agree with that, please consult > metadata.xml for the package or reassign to bug-wranglers with an > explanation (and perhaps a promise to quickly change metadata.xml. :)
We're using XML 1.0 and as far as I know (please correct me if I'm wrong) does the specification not guarantee element order. And because of this I don't understand why we're not introducing a new attribute (let's call it "primary_maintainer") which can be set to "true" for the primary herd/maintainer (and which is being interpreted as "false" if not present). Then it's clear which address has to be put in Bugzilla's "Assigned To:" field... Cheers, Tiziano -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
