On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:13:34 +0200 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > So you're volunteering to convert the entire tree to the new EAPI > > all in one go every two months? > > I don't see the need and I won't see the problem given right now what > is interesting is the set of improvements that aren't forward > incompatible.
It's likely that any future EAPIs won't be forward compatible because: * There's a strong desire to make lots of functions stricter. * The current *DEPEND syntax will probably be replaced with something more expressive. * There'll be more phases. So yes, it's a full tree rewrite if you want to avoid having multiple EAPIs in the same tree. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
