On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:38:52 +0530
"Arun Raghavan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > - it doubles the number of file reads necessary during resolution.
> 
> The first read will cause the file to be cached for subsequent reads
> anyway, so the performance hit boils down to an additional read() call
> (which will probably be buffered by your file I/O library anyway, so
> it's unlikely to even result in a context switch). And even without,
> it is well worth the lack of fugliness in the ebuild name.

No, it results in a new open() on a file that's elsewhere on disk, which
results in two new seeks. You get about fifty seeks per second.

> > - it heavily restricts future syntax and meaning of EAPIs
> 
> Not by much. It's just a header.

<!-- EAPI="3" -->


-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to