On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:56:23 -0700
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * easy to shoehorn in for any profile.bashrc compliant manager 
> (portage/pkgcore); realize paludis is left out here (via it 
> intentionally being left out of PMS atm by ciaran), but 
> profile.bashrc *is* used by ebuild devs, thus it's a viable course (I 
> don't see profile.bashrc ever going away basically).

If profile.bashrc is to be kept, it means massively reducing what can
be done in there.

> * doesn't address versioning changes.

Or indeed any change where the ebuild can't be visible to older package
managers without breaking them.

So basically it's not a solution at all.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to