On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:36:28 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to suggest new policy stating that packages should > respect LDFLAGS. Small amount of packages which ignore LDFLAGS should > be patched to respect them. Such patches are usually small and easy > to write. > > This policy is required to allow QA team to fix packages which ignore > LDFLAGS. Um, this already is the policy. We've always fixed bug reports about LDFLAGS being ignored. -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
