2008-07-26 18:06:12 Ryan Hill napisał(a): > On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:36:28 +0200 > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would like to suggest new policy stating that packages should > > respect LDFLAGS. Small amount of packages which ignore LDFLAGS should > > be patched to respect them. Such patches are usually small and easy > > to write. > > > > This policy is required to allow QA team to fix packages which ignore > > LDFLAGS. > > Um, this already is the policy. We've always fixed bug reports about > LDFLAGS being ignored.
Mark Loeser (Halcy0n) (QA project leader) said on 2008-07-24 that this policy doesn't exist. I understand that bug reports about LDFLAGS being ignored are usually fixed, so I ask for the formal enacting of this policy. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
