John Brooks wrote:
> Random idea: How about a different bug assignee for maintainer-needed
> packages with provided ebuilds/patches? Either something generic, or
> try to go for something more category/package specific (herds, etc).
> Lots of work for bugwranglers, though. There is a huge difference to
> developers between an unmaintained package with no progress and just
> looking over an ebuild that has been used successfully by several
> people.

No need for an additional mail/bugzie alias here, we could simply use a
KEYWORD like the existing 'Inclusion' (which isn't used that much for
now, 63 open bugs have that keyword) or a new 'HasPatch' as a
counterpart for 'NeedPatch'.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply via email to