Ben de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > 2) Continued presence of forcefully retired devs > It really baffles me that some developers are forcefully retired for > anti-social behavior, but are not consequently banned from the places > where they display this behavior, such as our MLs and IRC channels. What > good is it to retire developers, but allow them to continue to be > disruptive? I would like the Council to decide for a change in our > policy on this point.
I personally don't see why they should be allowed to stay part of our communication channels where they have caused problems bad enough to get them retired. With that being said, I think the same technical issues come into play here as with banning someone from "Gentoo" entirely. I am not sure how we would be able to enforce this across the board for forcefully retired developers. -- Mark Loeser email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com web - http://www.halcy0n.com
pgpvsdKcZDfkV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
