081005 Ryan Hill wrote: > 5 Oct 2008 "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> For projects where the upstream has vanished off the face of the planet >> but ... the code works fine still, there's problems >> with either the requirements of HOMEPAGE or the repoman check. >> Either we need special cases to declare it no longer has a homepage >> or we need to allow the empty HOMEPAGE. > I'd rather see "unknown" or something that implies "I looked, no luck" > rather than "I forgot to fill this in".
As a user who sometimes checks the upstream site for further info, I strongly support eg 'Unknown' or 'No support site can be found'. Leaving it blank is ambiguous & might even encourage a buzy dev not to bother trying to find a changed upstream site. -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
