В Вск, 02/11/2008 в 12:11 -0700, Gordon Malm пишет:
> You can cry "abuse" all you want.  You FAIL to offer any alternatives or 
> solutions.  I'll ask again, how do you detect that you are compiling code 
> destined to be run in-kernel from within gcc without checking for the 
> __KERNEL__ macro?  I think we both know the answer.

Gordon, as far as I see our linux-mod.eclass builds each kernel module
separately and it is possible to modify it to pass CFLAGS you wish for
kernel modules only and as such avoid using __KERNEL__ macro for this...


Reply via email to