-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Peter Volkov wrote: > В Птн, 13/03/2009 в 19:09 +0100, Federico Ferri пишет: >> btw, on a different topic: the number of bugs on tcltk (8.5) has >> lowered a bit. maybe it's time to unmask it and have package >> maintainers fix the outdated apps? > > A number of packages depend on itcl which does not builds with 8.5. > unfortunately itcl didn't seen a release since long time ago (but development happens in CVS)
few weeks ago, Itcl/Itk 4.0_beta3 were released (requires Tcl 8.6, which is in beta1) you can find those fresh pkgs in my tcl-8.6 overlay (layman -a tcl-8.6) > It is maintained by tcl/tk herd. What's your stance on this > package? Same question about otcl, but less packages (the only > net-analyzer/nam?) depend on it. I'm sorry, I tried but didn't succeed to fix otcl :-( I could report the issue upstream, and let things flow - -- Federico Ferri -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm9bNUACgkQV/B5axfzrPu1EACbB52ul7RKLFFkfzNT3yQuBVAT /CcAnR7oNqakXvgeham2afm3U8WV/5If =shj/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
