On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Ciaran McCreesh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2009 10:13:51 +0200 (CEST) > [email protected] wrote: >> So, "::" vs "@" apart, is it something that is worth looking and >> implementing in future EAPIs? > > Isn't it just a user issue, not one we want used anywhere where EAPI > rules are in effect? >
Indeed. Since the consensus is for using it as part of the UI, you don't need to wait for EAPI=4, you (lxnay) can start writing patches for portage (regardless of which operator is used) to recognize such atoms on the command line. -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan
