lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote: > So, "::" vs "@" apart, is it something that is worth looking and > implementing in future EAPIs? >
I don't see the main tree referring to other repositories any time soon so this is not a pressing issue. But as said earlier this makes sense for /etc/portage stuff so there going forward seems prudent. I suggest using "::" as it's more established in these circles. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
