Tiziano Müller wrote: > As you can see currently, most time is needed to implemente the features > in portage. It therefore doesn't make sense to make the EAPI process > even faster. On the other hand, I think it would make sense to have a > separate group developing new EAPIs instead of the council. > > Cheers, > Tiziano
I agree with what's being said here. The previous council ran into a huge road block with EAPI and GLEP's. I think that EAPI's should be moved to the Portage herd, and GLEPs assigned as necessary until final approval or dissent is given by the council. This would hopefully reduce contention with GLEP's as has happened in the past, and put EAPI's closer to the devs who will implement them. Andrew D Kirch Funtoo.org
