On Saturday 12 June 2010 23:22:09 Brian Harring wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:42:10PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > > perl_ldap is feature-ful but hard to use. The bind options are > > confusing (user / recruiters / infra) do I bind as myself? As anon? > > Do I specify -b user or > > -b antarus? Mutli-valued attributes are confusing for users. > > We should specifically have a tool for this instead of having people > invoking perl_ldap- said tool also gives us easier validation and > sanity checking. I'd started one in '06 but had to retire it at > the time due to ldaps not being supported by the python ldap bindings > I was using- afaik that issue bindings wise is now long since gone. > > Robin, any remenant of that survive? Else a new one could be wrote I > suppose. > ~harring
I wrote a django ldap frontend for my uni thesis, and the ldap library for python was working very well, so I would like to help on that. -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE, Qt, SGML, Overlays, Planet Teams blog.tampakrap.gr
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
