On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 06:26:36PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > So you want me to force everyone to update the package just to respect > > the LDFLAGS. > > yes. IIRC it has been stated on this list before, that a change which > changes the resulting binary always needs to be done in a revbump. List? Really? I use devmanual for ebuild development not list archives. > > > Why, since until recently, nobody gave a crap about this > > kind of QA issues? > > Thats a bad excuse! Yet it is true. The tree is flood with such packages. So my assumption is correct. Maintainers didn't and still don't give a crap about this QA issue, other they wouldn't commit broken packages in the first place > > > > > Please provide a patch for devmanual to make it more clear. > > Good idea. Any takers? > > thanks > kind regards > > Thilo
-- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org Key ID: 441AC410 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410
pgpQyU6NZZJEv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
