On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:36:50 +0200 Maciej Mrozowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> If SCons is unpredictable, then don't provide *any* phases and only > functions and rename it to scons-utils to match its purpose. It is as predictable as the buildsystem meeting the default phase functions requirements -- we can configure it, compile it but no way of knowing what should be done in 'install' for sure. > What I hate is deliberately introduced inconsistency in ebuild API's. What I hate is replicating bad practices just because someone else did that before. If I'm wrong, then please point me the relation between a particular buildsystem and patching. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://mgorny.alt.pl> <xmpp:[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
