On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 06:38:48PM +0300, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > On Friday 17 September 2010 18:33:01 Alex Alexander wrote: > > I don't think ego has anything to do with this. Arfrever brought this on > > himself. His [multiple] past mistakes and lack of cooperation are > > forcing the other devs to screen all his commits now, to make sure > > history doesn't repeat itself. > > I object here, I asked Arfrever's help (either with python or python ebuilds) > and every time I got some great feedback.
Thats great! I never claimed he wasn't *helpful*. Accepting critisism and suggestions from fellow devs is something completely different. > > Angelo, while I agree with your general thoughts on why everyone is > > contributing, I believe you should have gathered more intel before > > sending an email like this. We do respect Arfrever's motivation, we just > > need to make sure it translates to good, trustworthy work. If we didn't, > > his request to return to Gentoo would have been denied. > > and I don't agree with this part, no need to say anything more than the > previous guys said. Why? Do you feel we don't respect his motivation? Do you believe his commits don't require screening after the recent events? I'm sure no-one really wants to see Arfrever, or any other dev, go. Then again, no-one wants a broken tree either, so checking everything down to the smallest detail for a while won't hurt that much. > > Regards, > > -- > Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) > Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays -- Alex Alexander | wired Gentoo Linux Developer | Council / Qt / Chromium / more www.linuxized.com
pgp5ecJVM1TkW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
