On 10/26/10 21:42, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Dne 26.10.2010 20:38, Krzysztof Pawlik napsal(a): > >> nelch...@s-lappy ~$ time eshowkw gcc > /dev/null > > Could you compare speed of your and mine script
Sure: nelch...@s-lappy ~/tmp$ time eshowkw gcc > /dev/null real 0m1.025s user 0m0.924s sys 0m0.092s nelch...@s-lappy ~/tmp$ time ./eshowkwng.py gcc > /dev/null real 0m1.203s user 0m1.124s sys 0m0.072s nelch...@s-lappy ~/tmp$ time /usr/bin/eshowkw gcc > /dev/null real 0m4.697s user 0m0.584s sys 0m0.368s nelch...@s-lappy ~/tmp$ time eshowkw wine > /dev/null real 0m1.310s user 0m0.952s sys 0m0.092s nelch...@s-lappy ~/tmp$ time ./eshowkwng.py wine > /dev/null real 0m1.425s user 0m1.344s sys 0m0.076s nelch...@s-lappy ~/tmp$ time /usr/bin/eshowkw wine > /dev/null real 0m7.048s user 0m1.596s sys 0m1.032s 0.1~0.2 sec is not noticeable much, so I can say that both versions are significantly faster than eshowkw from gentoolkit-dev :) (results for mine version of eshowkw are worse than previous because I'm running on the battery right now and have powersave governor set) -- Krzysztof Pawlik <nelchael at gentoo.org> key id: 0xF6A80E46 desktop-misc, java, vim, kernel, python, apache...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
