On Monday 01 November 2010 13:33:47 Zac Medico (zmedico) wrote: > zmedico 10/11/01 16:33:47 > > Modified: portage-2.2.0_alpha1.ebuild portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild > ChangeLog portage-2.2.0_alpha3.ebuild > portage-2.2.0_alpha2.ebuild > Log: > Drop keywords from portage-2.2*, as a substitute for masking via > package.mask. This alleviates issues for cases like bug #336692 in which > people want to use profiles to unmask portage-2.2.
Does portage 2.1 have preserve-libs? If not, pretty please, readd the ~sparc- fbsd and ~x86-fbsd keywords. We unmasked portage 2.2 a while ago because we relied on preserve-libs for the upgrades. Esp. one where libc.so.6 becomes libc.so.7... without preserve-libs its almost impossible to upgrade from one release to another one without a full reinstall. A.
