On 11/02/2010 03:20 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Monday 01 November 2010 13:33:47 Zac Medico (zmedico) wrote: >> zmedico 10/11/01 16:33:47 >> >> Modified: portage-2.2.0_alpha1.ebuild portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild >> ChangeLog portage-2.2.0_alpha3.ebuild >> portage-2.2.0_alpha2.ebuild >> Log: >> Drop keywords from portage-2.2*, as a substitute for masking via >> package.mask. This alleviates issues for cases like bug #336692 in which >> people want to use profiles to unmask portage-2.2. > > > Does portage 2.1 have preserve-libs? If not, pretty please, readd the ~sparc- > fbsd and ~x86-fbsd keywords. We unmasked portage 2.2 a while ago because we > relied on preserve-libs for the upgrades. Esp. one where libc.so.6 becomes > libc.so.7... without preserve-libs its almost impossible to upgrade from one > release to another one without a full reinstall. > > A.
Alright, I've added back the *-fbsd keywords now. -- Thanks, Zac
