2010-11-16 00:41:35 Alex Alexander napisał(a):
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 07:40:44PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
> > Some updates to my suggestion:
> > - Files would optionally end with "-${EAPI}" suffix.
> > - The following files would be affected:
> > package.mask
> > package.unmask
> > package.keywords
> > package.accept_keywords
> > package.use
> > package.provided
> > use.force
> > use.mask
> > use.unsatisfiable
> > package.use.force
> > package.use.mask
> > package.use.unsatisfiable
> > packages
> > virtuals
> >
> > (Some of these files aren't documented in PMS.)
> >
> > I would like to suggest that this feature be included in EAPI="4".
> > I have a patch, which implements this feature in Portage.
>
> The council has already decided that a filename suffix is not a
> desirable way to fix issues like this.GLEP 55 changes established filename extension, while my proposition affects files, which don't have any common extension. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
