On Saturday 22 January 2011 10:55:19 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > 1. > We EXPLICITLY need a location for private repositories.
didn't know that, so i guess the private dir should be: private - infra - (infrapriv1).git - (infrapriv2).git - foundation - (foundpriv1).git - (foundpriv2).git - pr - .... > - Some of the developer+user repos are NOT overlays, but Gentoo-specific > code/applications. These DON'T belong here, they should go to project/ > - On one hand, I would like user repositories to have a separate > namespace, so that other users realize a given repo is NOT from a > developer. > - On the other side, what do we do when a user with a repo becomes a > developer (and when they retire?) > Well, the distinction for unofficial/official overlays happen mostly in layman -L, I don't think users pay attention to our git repo list. Furthermore, I got at least three requests from developers to move their repo from user/ to dev/ (same problem when devs retired). This distinction doesn't make any sense. > > These are projects, why not include them there? > All of the above are *.gentoo.org subdomains > > project (includes SOC projects, forks, gentoo projects etc) > > > > - devmanual.git > > - portage.git > > - ... > > devmanual IS a website... > > How are you differentiating project vs. website? devmanual should go to website/, you are right. In project/ belongs anything that is not a *.g.o subdomain, and is not an overlay (SOC projects, upstream projects (portage, gorg, rbot*, znurt), forks (gitolite-gentoo)) > > [1] We intend on having public infra repos as well, and just having the > fewest private repos. Send them to project/ as well ;) -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
