110815 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 08/15/11 21:55, Michał Górny wrote: >> Considering the number of different virtuals in this category, >> maybe it would be a good idea to split it a little? >> -- maybe creating some kind of '*-virtual' categories. >> For example, half of the current virtuals are prefixed with 'perl-'. >> Maybe they could be transformed into 'perl-virtual/*'? > right now all virtuals are easily recognizable > and nicely grouped into one category.
If you're going to take that route, which mb a small improvement, it sb 'virtual-perl', 'virtual-java' etc. It would help users see more clearly what sundry virtuals are for: the present size of the category is less important than clarity. -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
