On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Patrick Lauer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/15/11 21:55, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:46:59 -0700 >> Alec Warner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Michał Górny <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Now that we don't have any old-style virtuals in gx86 anymore, >>>> I think the 'virtual' category is basically one another plain >>>> category nowadays. >>>> >>>> Considering the number of different virtuals in this category, >>>> maybe it would be a good idea to split it a little? What I'm >>>> proposing is maybe creating some kind of '*-virtual' categories. >>>> >>>> For example, half of the current virtuals are prefixed with 'perl-'. >>>> Maybe they could be transformed into 'perl-virtual/*'? >>> >>> why? >> >> Because I like categories much more than I do prefixes. >> > > But right now all virtuals are easily recognizable and nicely grouped > into one category. From my point of view that's the best categorization > we could ask for ... what would we gain from changing it? >
Nothing IMO. +1 to keep virtuals as they are now. Regards, -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/
