On Monday, September 12, 2011 15:19:29 Nathan Phillip Brink wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 03:55:49PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > as for no-multilib systems, "lib64" will be the same, and "lib" will be > > symlinked to "lib64". this will be easier i think to share files between > > multilib and non-multilib 64bit systems. > > Isn't this slightly more complicated than it needs to be? Why not just > use /lib and no symlink for no-multilib 64-bit systems?
all the 64bit binaries have /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 encoded in them, so /lib64/ must exist on the system. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
