On Wednesday 07 December 2011 09:07:41 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Some time ago the selinux team restructured the selinux profiles and
> made a features/selinux which could be stacked on the hardened profiles
> for x86/amd64. At that time I also tested and found that it stacked
> fine on default/linux/{amd64,x86}/10.0. I'm emailing the list to see if
> there's any reason why we shouldn't add
> default/linux/{amd64,x86}/10.0/selinux. Currently I prefer adding it
> directly to 10.0 rather than 10.0/server because the status of the later
> is uncertain. Selinux on the desktops is not being strongly supported
> so its not appropriate there either, leaving only 10.0/selinux. If
> added eselect profile list would show
>
> [1] default/linux/amd64/10.0
> [2] default/linux/amd64/10.0/selinux
> [3] default/linux/amd64/10.0/desktop
> [4] default/linux/amd64/10.0/desktop/gnome
> [5] default/linux/amd64/10.0/desktop/kde
> [6] default/linux/amd64/10.0/developer
> [7] default/linux/amd64/10.0/no-multilib
> [8] default/linux/amd64/10.0/server
> [9] hardened/linux/amd64 *
> [10] hardened/linux/amd64/selinux
> [11] hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib
> [12] hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinuxwe have the selinux/ root. is that no longer necessary ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
