On 12/07/2011 01:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 December 2011 09:07:41 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> Some time ago the selinux team restructured the selinux profiles and
>> made a features/selinux which could be stacked on the hardened profiles
>> for x86/amd64. At that time I also tested and found that it stacked
>> fine on default/linux/{amd64,x86}/10.0. I'm emailing the list to see if
>> there's any reason why we shouldn't add
>> default/linux/{amd64,x86}/10.0/selinux. Currently I prefer adding it
>> directly to 10.0 rather than 10.0/server because the status of the later
>> is uncertain. Selinux on the desktops is not being strongly supported
>> so its not appropriate there either, leaving only 10.0/selinux. If
>> added eselect profile list would show
>>
>> [1] default/linux/amd64/10.0
>> [2] default/linux/amd64/10.0/selinux
>> [3] default/linux/amd64/10.0/desktop
>> [4] default/linux/amd64/10.0/desktop/gnome
>> [5] default/linux/amd64/10.0/desktop/kde
>> [6] default/linux/amd64/10.0/developer
>> [7] default/linux/amd64/10.0/no-multilib
>> [8] default/linux/amd64/10.0/server
>> [9] hardened/linux/amd64 *
>> [10] hardened/linux/amd64/selinux
>> [11] hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib
>> [12] hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux
>
> we have the selinux/ root. is that no longer necessary ?
> -mike
We deprecated that when we moved to the features/selinux. The point was
to avoid duplication and maintain all selinux profile stuff in one
place, then just stack it on top of other profiles like we did with [10]
and [12] above. We now want to extend it to [2].
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
