On 13 March 2012 10:14, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, James Broadhead wrote: > >> I'm sure that it's been considered already, but what are the arguments >> against embedding the EAPI on a per-package (default) or per-version >> basis in metadata.xml. It IS metadata after all. > > You can find a recent discussion in bug 402167, comment #4 and > following. <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402167#c4>
I note that there is a link to the council minutes, with the reason for voting "no" against GLEP55 being "it has issues that are unsolved", but I don't see any reference to said issues. Is the actual IRC transcript available? Because I'd hate for this decision to have been made on the assumption of issues which didn't really exist. -- Kent perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, 3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );"
