Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2012, 23:15:46 schrieb Markos Chandras:
> On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel"
> >
> > <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with
> >> the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to
> >> get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide
> >> where to put them.
> >>
> >> Suggestion: new category office-ext
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >
> > office-plugins, to follow suit.
>
> This may be confusing as people would expect these plugins to work
> with both {open,libre}office packages. If these plugins are just for
> libreoffice then I would prefer app-libreoffice like other people have
> already suggestedI've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work with anything that uses the so-called "uno bridge". This is why I like the new category "office-plugins" best... and would like to implement that one. Any additional objections? Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer kde (team lead), sci, tex, arm, printing dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
