-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/12 09:06, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2012, 23:15:46 schrieb Markos Chandras:
>> On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel"
>>>
>>> <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>> there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with
>>>> the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to
>>>> get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide
>>>> where to put them.
>>>>
>>>> Suggestion: new category office-ext
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> office-plugins, to follow suit.
>>
>> This may be confusing as people would expect these plugins to work
>> with both {open,libre}office packages. If these plugins are just for
>> libreoffice then I would prefer app-libreoffice like other people have
>> already suggested
>
> I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office
> variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work
> with
> anything that uses the so-called "uno bridge".
>
> This is why I like the new category "office-plugins" best... and would like
> to
> implement that one.
>
> Any additional objections?
I prefer app-plugins even if it is broader.
lu
- --
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk+myw0ACgkQ6Ex4woTpDjTVJwCfZjNrwt9WXj6JlELPLwF60kj2
wl4An3EM5GaEvUTsVRbTlVIP+puoQz35
=nn8m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
