On Monday 21 May 2012 15:04:44 Pacho Ramos wrote: > El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió: > > On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see > > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools. > > eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134 > > > > Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a terrible > > idea, but a few ebuilds did it anyway. Those ebuilds are now *broken* > > since they can no longer use epatch. See bug #416847 for an example. > > > > Check your ebuilds to make sure you inherit eutils in anything that uses > > epatch! > > Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are > a lot as I have seen running: > grep inherit $(grep -r epatch */*/*.ebuild| cut -d: -f1) | grep -v > eutils
this is what i was using:
find /usr/portage/*-* -name '*.ebuild' -exec grep -l '\<epatch\>' {} + | \
xargs grep -L inherit.*eutils
there's quite a number there :(
> Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning should be added when
> an ebuild is using epatch without inheriting eutils directly, otherwise
> this problem could reappear if some other eclass no longer inherit it in
> the future :-/
yeah, a repoman check would be a really good idea
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
