On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote: > Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing. > First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then > remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out > of nowhere. I don't believe this issue was that urgent in order to > justify the significant breakage of portage tree.
you're assuming the breakage was intentional. i also wouldn't really describe it as "significant", but that's just quibbling over an insignificant aspect. but what's done is done. fix the ebuilds and move on. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
